Community of VE/MapPoint Users and Developers
This is a discussion on MP web services image quality, can we improve image quality? within the MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion forums, part of the Map Forums category; Looking at our application that uses MP web services the quality of the street level detail seems poor compare to ...
| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| MP web services image quality, can we improve image quality? Specifically streets are drawn in thin lines with scant road information when using webservices but using the MS mappoint website the street detail and image quaility of maps is much better, streets are displayed with much neater bounded white areas. Is there a setting or parameter that we can use to get the same level of detail and image quality through our web services application as MS use for their own MP web services apps? Any help is much appreciated. Lawrie |
| |||
|
Hi Lawrie, Probably the image is as mutch compressed as possible to gain speed. I suggest to copy your message to the mappoint web service forum as well at: http://www.mp2kmag.com/mappoint/disc...forum.asp?f=11
__________________ rgds, Wilfried Mestdagh www.mestdagh.biz MapPoint coding demo Order MapPoint 2009 with Routing and User Tools Spreadsheet |
![]() |
| Tags |
| image, improve, quality, services, web |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quality of MapPoint Geodatabase. | Anonymous | MapPoint Web Service and Virtual Earth | 0 | 02-01-2005 03:27 PM |
| Quality printing | Anonymous | MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion | 1 | 03-03-2004 01:33 PM |
| Map Quality | Anonymous | MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion | 1 | 09-16-2003 08:58 PM |
| Quality of MapPoint | otto | MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion | 0 | 01-13-2003 05:24 PM |
| How can I export maps from MapPoint as quality ima.... | Anonymous | MapPoint 2006/2009 Discussion | 1 | 06-20-1999 07:09 PM |